Merger of Titles in Ontario

Question:

I understand that if someone purchases adjoining’ land/properties … that the 2 merge “as one” and would eventually need to be severed before any parcel can be sold.

My questions are regarding specifics around this.

For instance:

1)  I heard from another registrant that EVEN if the property is located diagonally across from each other (only touching via common corner post) that this holds true as well.  Is this really the case?  I can see side by side or front and back joining … but touching at a point??

2)  Also, if the 2 adjoining lots have different ownerships (but ONE common owner) does this still hold true?  I am told that it does … but that doesn’t make sense to me.  For instance, SMITH and JONES own 22 ANYSTREET … subsequently SMITH (without JONES) purchases 24 ANYSTREET (adjoining property) OR SMITH and JONES AND DOBSON PURCHASE it … does the addition or removal of an owner change the merging of the 2 lands?  I would be surprised if JONES would be subjected to severance process/costs if 22 ANYSTREET is to be sold.

3)  What if adjoining property is purchased in a Corporation (numbered business) opened by same owner?  Does that matter? Or is the Corporation viewed as a distinct identity and separate owner?

Answer:

  1. Checkerboarding is not legal, it runs contrary to the provisions of the Planning Act,
  2. Different names will be sufficient to avoid merger. The only problem is identical names.
  3. No, this arrangement would avoid merger.

Also, merger doesn’t always occur, noted exceptions include:

  1. The whole of a lot on a registered plan of subdivision, so two side by side lots are fine,
  2. A parcel which has consent for severance,
  3. The remainder after the first parcel was severed.

Brian Madigan LL.B., Broker

www.OntarioRealEstateSource.com

Comments 2

  1. We own two side by side lots in Muskoka and we are in the midst of negotiations for a new mortgage with the TD Bank. They are claiming that the lots are merged yet they have separate titles and we pay taxes on both. MPAC tells us they are separate properties.
    These lots are part of a registered subdivision ( registered in 1972) and we believe that this is an exemption from the planning act.
    How do we prove this to the bank?

    1. Post
      Author

      What is the legal description for each of the two lots?

      If you are concerned about this website being “public”, then please email me at BRMadigan2rogers.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.